Mandating hpv vaccination what are the arguments dating is it worth the risk reb bradley
"What they would like to see is the federal government get out of their business." Half an hour later, Perry defended a 2007 executive order in which he ordered girls to be vaccinated against HPV, a sexually transmitted virus. Last month, when the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the federal health insurance mandate, Perry crowed, "Yet another federal court has recognized that the Obama Administration's attempt to force each and every American to purchase health insurance is an egregious violation of our Constitutional rights." Last night, in his attack on Romney, Perry extended this argument to state-mandated health insurance. Four years ago, he issued an executive order instructing the Texas health commissioner to "adopt rules that mandate the age appropriate vaccination of all female children for HPV prior to admission to the sixth grade." Unlike Romney and President Obama, Perry didn't work out the mandate with his Legislature. Perry justified the order by citing public expense.
Today, only one state, Virginia, has such a law, and it leaves a loophole for parents to opt out.Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection, currently affecting more than 79 million Americans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In fact, the rate of cancers caused by HPV has soared in recent years.This year alone, it’s estimated that more than 12,000 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer— nearly all of those cases would be caused by high-risk strains of HPV.In a statement announcing his decree, he explained: "Requiring young girls to get vaccinated before they come into contact with HPV is responsible health and fiscal policy that has the potential to significantly reduce cases of cervical cancer and mitigate future medical costs." When conservatives accused Perry of usurping parental authority, he replied, "While I understand the concerns expressed by some, I stand firmly on the side of protecting life." Texas legislators answered Perry's fiat by overturning his order.Lacking the votes to stop them, he didn't veto their repeal bill, but he didn't sign it, and he defended the order.